Compliance Framework

Our institutional-grade methodology for assessing stablecoin regulatory compliance, operational risk, and institutional readiness.

Our Philosophy

StableLens was built to bridge the gap between DeFi innovation and institutional compliance requirements. We believe that comprehensive risk assessment and regulatory awareness are essential for the mature adoption of stablecoins in institutional portfolios.

Our compliance framework is designed by former regulators, compliance officers, and institutional risk managers who understand both the opportunities and challenges of digital asset integration.

95+
Compliance Factors
15+
Jurisdictions Tracked
500+
Institutions Served

Compliance Scoring Methodology

Regulatory Clarity

30% Weight

Evaluates the clarity and favorability of regulatory frameworks governing the stablecoin in key jurisdictions.

Regulatory status and classification
Licensing and registration requirements
Compliance with local securities laws
Anti-money laundering (AML) compliance

Reserve Transparency

25% Weight

Assesses the transparency and verifiability of underlying reserve assets backing the stablecoin.

Regular attestation frequency
Reserve composition disclosure
Third-party audit quality
Real-time reserve monitoring

Audit Quality

20% Weight

Evaluates the quality and credibility of independent audits and attestations performed on the stablecoin system.

Big Four accounting firm involvement
Audit scope and depth
Financial statement audits
Smart contract security audits

Geographic Risk

15% Weight

Analyzes jurisdiction-specific risks and regulatory environments where the stablecoin operates and holds reserves.

Issuer jurisdiction assessment
Reserve custody jurisdictions
Political and economic stability
Regulatory predictability

Operational Security

10% Weight

Assesses operational security practices, incident history, and risk management procedures.

Security incident history
Multi-signature implementations
Key management practices
Insurance coverage

Compliance Score Ranges

90-100

Excellent

Institutional-ready with comprehensive compliance frameworks, regular audits, and clear regulatory standing. Suitable for large institutional allocations.

75-89

Good

Generally compliant with strong operational practices. Appropriate for institutional use with standard risk management procedures.

60-74

Fair

Moderate compliance with some areas for improvement. Requires enhanced due diligence and ongoing monitoring for institutional use.

Below 60

Poor

Significant compliance concerns or regulatory uncertainties. Not recommended for institutional allocation without substantial risk mitigation measures.

Important Disclaimer

Not Investment Advice: StableLens compliance scores and analysis are provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice, financial advice, or recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any digital assets.

Regulatory Changes: Regulatory frameworks for digital assets are rapidly evolving. Compliance scores may change as new regulations are implemented or existing ones are modified.

Due Diligence Required: Institutions should conduct their own comprehensive due diligence and consult with legal and compliance professionals before making investment decisions.

No Guarantee: While we strive for accuracy, we make no guarantees about the completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of our compliance assessments.